Best Microsoft Dynamics 365 Consulting Services (2026)
May 11, 202620 mins read
There are thousands of companies offering Microsoft consulting services. On AppSource (Microsoft’s marketplace for providers) you can find more than 1,500 companies offering consulting services just for Dynamics 365. And what makes one provider “the best” for one client or industry might make it a terrible fit for another.
One thing to keep in mind when choosing a D365 consultancy is that it’s typically less about finding the biggest or best-known firm and more about finding the best fit for your specific operational needs. Because D365 is a broad ecosystem — spanning from Finance and Supply Chain to CX and Power Platform — your criteria should focus on technical depth and industry alignment.
The following list of the best Microsoft D365 consulting services providers includes more than a dozen providers in what is often known as the Microsoft-focused enterprise partners — those who specialize in the Microsoft stack.
You won’t see the biggest GSIs (like Accenture) or boutique firms. Instead, you’ll see a comprehensive list of firms who match the mentioned criteria: technical depth and industry alignment. Note that this is an alphabetical list based on publicly available information. We’re not playing favorites. (Click any name to jump to their details.)
Table of Contents
- Alithya
- Argano
- Avanade
- Cognizant
- Columbus Global
- Cynoteck
- DXC Technology
- Dynamics Square
- Encore Business
- HCLTech
- Hitachi
- HSO
- Rand Group
- RSM
- sa.global
- Sikich LLP
- Sunrise Technologies
What Dynamics 365 consulting covers
Dynamics 365 consulting guides organizations through the full lifecycle of digital transformation — from strategic advisory that aligns software capabilities with business goals to defining the scope of specific modules, such as Finance, Supply Chain Management, or Sales.
Implementation encompasses workflow configuration, secure data migration, and complex integrations that connect D365 to third-party applications and the broader Power Platform. Alongside technical deployment, change management and tailored training programs ensure adoption — whether users are managing omnichannel retail in Commerce or optimizing technician schedules in Field Service. Most engagements conclude with managed services, providing ongoing support, performance tuning, and technical updates that allow the platform to evolve with the business.
Consulting expertise spans both front- and back-office operations across the full D365 suite. Customer-facing engagements optimize Sales and Customer Service workflows for pipeline visibility and case resolution, while Customer Insights unifies fragmented data for personalized marketing. Operationally, Project Operations bridges sales and delivery, Human Resources streamlines the employee lifecycle, Supply Chain Management delivers real-time inventory and manufacturing visibility, and Finance ensures robust fiscal reporting and automated compliance.
How to evaluate Dynamics 365 consulting partners
Evaluating a Dynamics 365 partner requires looking beyond basic technical proficiency to find a strategic ally.
Start by verifying Microsoft designations. The "Solutions Partner for Business Applications" status is the current benchmark, but look deeper for Advanced Specializations in specific areas like Finance or Sales, which prove a higher level of audited success. (A firm with Partner of the Year win/finalist credentials may also factor into your decision.)
Industry expertise is equally vital; a consultant who understands the nuances of, say, manufacturing or life science can leverage pre-built templates to accelerate your timeline.
Industry experience should also be paired with a modern architectural approach. The best partners don’t treat D365 as “standalone”; they treat it as a hub, utilizing Azure integration for data flow and Power Apps to build low-code extensions that solve unique business gaps without over-customizing the core code.
Regarding execution, insist on a proven implementation methodology—such as Microsoft’s Success by Design—to ensure the project stays on track. Security in Dynamics 365 is paramount; your partner must demonstrate a deep understanding of Dynamics 365 security models, from role-based access to environment isolation.
Finally, vet their Support SLAs. A partner’s value is often proven post-launch through their ability to manage mandatory updates and provide rapid response times, ensuring your system remains a high-performing asset.
Comparing the Best Dynamics 365 ERP Consultants
Following is a list we compiled of commonly known current strengths (and possible weaknesses) of leading Microsoft Dynamics 365 consulting partners, all of whom have a shared strength of leveraging Microsoft’s ERP innovations to quickly and more completely serve their clients. The table is followed by a deeper dive into each partner’s pros and cons.
|
Company |
2025 -2026 Inner Circle Partner |
Dynamics 365 IP (extensions and/or accelerators)** |
Primary/known differentiator(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
IP related to higher education and specialized manufacturing (the "Alithya 365" industry-specific configurations) |
High-impact adoption and training frameworks that bridge the gap between technical deployment and user proficiency |
|
|
X |
Specialized accelerators focused on supply chain visibility and data migration to speed up D365 Finance & Operations rollouts |
Unified, full-lifecycle approach that harmonizes D365 with the broader Microsoft stack, building architectures where Azure and Power Platform work in tandem to create a truly integrated digital foundation |
|
|
X |
“Intelligent” industry-specific layers (e.g., Avanade Finance Foundation) as well as pre-built configurations to accelerate a D365 rollout |
Proprietary "Foundations" (pre-built code bases) for specific global sectors like Intelligent Manufacturing or Banking |
|
|
|
Multiple accelerators and industry clouds that combine D365 with AI, Power Platform, and Azure to solve high-scale enterprise challenges |
Experts at integrating Microsoft solutions into diverse IT landscapes involving AWS, Salesforce, or SAP |
|
|
|
IP for food/beverage and manufacturing, including compliance tools |
Deep vertical expertise in manufacturing and food distribution; consultants “speak the language” of the shop floor and the supply chain
|
|
|
|
Primarily a custom development shop (no listings on AppSource) |
Specializes in lean, cost-effective customizations by leveraging a robust offshore development model |
|
|
X |
"Industry Print" solutions that pre-configure D365 for specific highly regulated or complex sectors |
Excels at managing the "heavy lifting" of massive technical debt, utilizing a global resource model to migrate legacy systems into modern D365 environments |
|
|
|
IP centered on tools that solve specific regional compliance or operational gaps that are often missing from the base product |
Mid-market agility and transparent pricing, offering straightforward, fixed-cost engagements for growing businesses |
|
|
|
Utility apps such as "Project Tracking" and tax-related extensions for the Canadian and US markets |
A sharp focus on the SMB and mid-market sectors, specifically excelling in Business Central implementations and dedicated long-term CRM support |
|
|
X |
Numerous industry-specific accelerators for Dynamics: Finance, utilities, manufacturing, and more |
Specializes in the technical "backbone" of D365, with expertise in large-scale engineering and infrastructure-heavy Microsoft deployments |
|
|
X |
Industry Clouds and accelerators for healthcare, retail, and banking |
Industry clouds and proprietary accelerators for sectors like Manufacturing, Retail, and Government, with a focus on highly regulated industries where audit trails and data governance are primary concerns |
|
|
X |
"Dynamics 365 for Rental," "Advanced Maintenance," and specialized tools |
Proven blueprints for global retail or manufacturing and Inner Circle legacy (maintained its status for 21 consecutive years) |
|
|
|
Multiple extensions on AppSource (particularly for Business Central) such as data validation and financial reporting |
Often positioned a professional services firm rather than a software house, and one of the few partners in the D365 ecosystem that leads with a fixed-fee, fixed-scope model |
|
|
|
A focus on IP for Business Central and CRM that streamlines financial reporting and customer engagement for mid-market clients |
Combines accounting and audit heritage with technical D365 skills to provide a uniquely business-centric perspective |
|
|
X |
Focus on project-based businesses (e.g., enhancements for D365 Project Operations for legal and professional services) |
A focus on localization with specialized, Microsoft-certified localization packs for complex markets like China, India, Indonesia, and Morocco |
|
|
|
HeadSTART (an implementation accelerator) as well as tools for life sciences and manufacturing |
A near universal focus on financial and accounting processes (governance, audits, compliance, etc.) |
|
|
|
Extensions for supply chain, apparel manufacturing, and omnichannel retail |
A near universal focus on the unique needs of retailers with a “pre-packaged” industry fit through its 365 extensions |
*Microsoft does not publish a list of Inner Circle Partners. This content in this table is based on publicly available information (e.g., a business announcing its Partner status via press release).
**These are samples and examples. For complete lists of published extensions and accelerators, visit Microsoft AppSource.
Alithya
Standout feature
Alithya differentiates itself through comprehensive training and user adoption programs that span both ERP and Customer Engagement workloads. Rather than simply deploying technology, the firm embeds change management discipline directly into its delivery model — ensuring your teams can operate and maximize D365 solutions well beyond go-live. This focus on adoption effectiveness is a genuine differentiator in a competitive Microsoft partner ecosystem.
Pros
A reliable choice for mid-market and enterprise organizations, Alithya brings a balanced capability set suited to both mid-market and enterprise clients across Finance, Operations, and CE. Its delivery teams demonstrate consistent project execution and maintain vendor relationships that enable reliable access to Microsoft resources and roadmap insights.
Cons
Its primary limitation may be its regional focus, which may pose challenges for global enterprises requiring boots-on-the-ground support in multiple international time zones. Organizations planning multi-geography rollouts — especially those requiring coordinated European or Asia-Pacific delivery — should evaluate this limitation carefully.
Argano
Standout feature
Argano functions as a full-lifecycle Microsoft solutions partner, delivering end-to-end D365 advisory, implementation, and integration across Power Platform and Azure. This comprehensive approach means you can engage a single trusted partner from initial strategy through deployment and ongoing optimization — eliminating the complexity of managing multiple vendors across critical workstreams. Learn more about the full scope of Argano’s Microsoft Dynamics 365 consulting services.
Pros
Clients benefit from enterprise-grade delivery and a comprehensive service catalog that covers everything from high-level advisory to deep technical implementation. Argano brings enterprise-grade delivery discipline to complex Microsoft transformation programs. The firm's breadth — spanning advisory, implementation, managed services, and integration — means you gain a partner capable of scaling with your program's demands, from initial deployment through continuous platform optimization and long-term roadmap alignment.
Cons
Its depth of capability and enterprise-grade positioning can sometimes carry a higher price point relative to smaller or offshore providers. Organizations with straightforward or narrowly scoped D365 requirements may find the investment disproportionate to their needs. A thorough discovery and scoping process is required upfront, which is appropriate given the complexity involved, but requires stakeholder time and decisiveness before engagement parameters are formally established.
Avanade
Standout feature
As a specialized joint venture between Accenture and Microsoft, Avanade is one of the most recognized Microsoft-specialist global system integrators, with acknowledged leadership across D365 advisory, implementation, and managed services. It brings proximity to the Microsoft product roadmap — translating that relationship into delivery methodologies, proprietary accelerators, and industry frameworks that can reduce risk on complex, large-scale transformation programs.
Pros
Its global scale often makes Avanade the go-to for multi-national transformations that require deep technical resources and sophisticated managed services. And its global delivery model provides consistent access to certified Microsoft talent across every major region — making it a reliable choice for multinational programs where cross-border coordination and talent continuity are non-negotiable.
Cons
The complexity of Avanade’s operations can often result in higher price points and significantly longer procurement and onboarding cycles compared to smaller firms. Its brand positioning commands a significant premium, placing it among the higher-cost options in the Microsoft partner ecosystem. Procurement and contracting cycles tend to be more extended, which can delay program initiation for organizations with pressing timelines. Finally, because of their alignment to Microsoft, they may not always provide objective solutions advice.
Cognizant
Standout feature
Cognizant shines in large-scale transformations where D365 is part of a broader, multi-cloud environment, and brings formidable scale to enterprise digital transformation, combining multi-cloud integration depth with rigorous program management for complex global deployments. For organizations where D365 represents one workstream within a broader technology modernization initiative — requiring coordination across AWS, Google Cloud, or legacy on-premises environments — Cognizant's ability to bridge platforms and orchestrate cross-ecosystem integration is meaningful.
Pros
Cognizant's end-to-end service portfolio — spanning strategy, implementation, integration, and managed services — positions it well to support the full scope of large, multi-geography D365 programs. Organizations facing substantial transformation complexity can leverage Cognizant's capacity to coordinate parallel workstreams, manage data migration at scale, and sustain stakeholder alignment across diverse geographies and organizational hierarchies throughout the program lifecycle.
Cons
Because they are a generalist, they have less Microsoft-only specialization, and their heavy governance layers can occasionally slow down project timelines. Cognizant's broad technology practice means D365 sits within a much larger portfolio, which can dilute Microsoft-specific specialization. Additionally, large consulting organizations of this scale typically incorporate multiple governance layers and approval processes into their engagement models — which can extend timelines and introduce procedural overhead.
Columbus Global
Standout feature
Columbus Global is typically the choice for the industrial sector, boasting deep vertical expertise in manufacturing and food distribution, embedding sector-specific process expertise directly into its D365 delivery methodology. Rather than relying on a generic ERP playbook, Columbus maps proven industry templates to your operational realities, which accelerates configuration decisions, reduces scope risk, and shortens the path to a stable production environment.
Pros
Its industry-specific ERP knowledge usually translates into faster implementation cycles and fewer surprises during deployment. Delivery teams bring functional familiarity with the processes, terminology, and compliance requirements your operations depend on — reducing the burden on your internal subject matter experts and accelerating alignment during requirements and design phases without unnecessary back-and-forth.
Cons
Its practice is geographically concentrated, with core strength in Europe and select international markets, which may limit its effectiveness for companies with highly dispersed international footprints. North American organizations or those planning coordinated global rollouts should scrutinize this carefully — the firm's staffing model and partner network may not provide the coverage density required to sustain delivery momentum across multiple regions.
Cynoteck
Standout feature
Leveraging offshore delivery capacity to extend your program's build resources at a fraction of onshore rates, Cynoteck provides cost-effective D365 customization and development services. For organizations with well-defined technical requirements that need execution capacity rather than advisory leadership, Cynoteck offers a practical model for accelerating development cycles, building integrations, and supporting configuration work within a controlled cost structure.
Pros
Cynoteck is a strong fit for organizations that have completed their design phase and need reliable execution capacity to carry it forward. Its team brings competence across D365 configuration, Power Platform development, and system integration work — making it a practical choice for augmenting internal teams or extending implementation capacity when budget discipline is a primary driver of vendor selection.
Cons
As its value proposition centers on execution capacity rather than enterprise program leadership, Cynotek’s change management, governance, and organizational readiness capabilities may not match the maturity required for complex, large-scale D365 deployments. Organizations undertaking significant business process transformation — not just technical builds — should assess whether Cynoteck's capability profile aligns with the full breadth of their program demands.
DXC Technology
Standout feature
DXC Technology brings an enterprise modernization orientation to D365 engagements, combining a global resource model with deep experience managing large-scale infrastructure, application, and cloud transformation programs. For organizations navigating significant technology estate complexity — including legacy system retirement, hybrid architecture design, and large workforce transitions — DXC's breadth of enterprise services provides a structured framework for managing that complexity throughout the D365 lifecycle.
Pros
Its vast organizational scale positions DXC well for complex transformation programs that require coordinated execution across multiple geographies, business units, and technology domains simultaneously. Organizations dealing with large, intricate system environments benefit from DXC's capacity to mobilize substantial delivery teams, manage cross-functional integration challenges, and sustain program momentum across extended timelines without compromising on delivery governance or risk oversight.
Cons
DXC Technology operates across a broad technology ecosystem. While this breadth benefits multi-platform enterprises, it can mean D365-specific depth and Microsoft certifications are distributed less densely than with a dedicated Microsoft partner. Organizations prioritizing sharp Microsoft expertise and active co-selling relationships may find purer-play alternatives better suited to their program requirements.
Dynamics Square
Standout feature
Dynamics Square targets mid-market organizations with a transparent, defined pricing model that reduces the cost ambiguity common in D365 implementations. This approach gives business leaders predictable investment figures from the outset, enabling confident budgeting and faster stakeholder approvals.
Pros
Its mid-market orientation goes beyond price with delivery teams structured for the decision-making pace and project scale characteristic of growing businesses. Engagements tend to move quickly through design and deployment phases, with consultants experienced in right-sizing D365 configurations to match actual operational needs rather than building for complexity that mid-market buyers will never use.
Cons
They are not enterprise-focused, meaning they may lack the specific governance frameworks required by multi-billion-dollar corporations with complex compliance needs. Organizations with multi-geography deployments, complex integration landscapes, or enterprise-grade change management demands should assess whether Dynamics Square's capabilities and available resources are sufficient for that level of program complexity.
Encore Business Solutions
Standout feature
Encore Business Solutions has developed a focused practice around Microsoft Business Central and CRM, offering implementation, support, and ongoing managed services tailored to mid-market organizations. This specialization results in delivery teams with deep functional knowledge of the specific modules most relevant to growing businesses — reducing onboarding friction and enabling more targeted configuration discussions from the earliest engagement stages.
Pros
They are “right-sized” for mid-market organizations, bringing practical, well-calibrated delivery experience for Business Central and CRM implementations. The team's familiarity with the scope, budget structures, and decision timelines typical of this segment enables efficient project execution — without the overhead associated with enterprise-scale delivery models. Organizations seeking accessible, competent D365 support without navigating large-firm complexity will find Encore a credible and responsive option.
Cons
As its regional footprint is smaller than global integrators, Encore is best suited to organizations with operations concentrated in its core service area. For businesses with distributed teams across multiple states, provinces, or countries, the firm's staffing depth and partner network may not scale to match that complexity — making it important to pressure-test geographic coverage assumptions before formalizing an engagement.
HCLTech
Standout feature
HCLTech brings the full resources of a global systems integrator to D365 engagements, including extensive delivery capacity, established global delivery centers, and industry practices spanning manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, and retail. For enterprises managing significant organizational complexity alongside their D365 program — particularly those with large-scale parallel IT transformation needs — HCLTech provides the coordination capability and resource depth the program requires.
Pros
With immense enterprise capability, and the ability to deploy hundreds of consultants, HCLTech provides access to technical talent and a global staff, and is able to manage complex integration requirements across distributed system environments. Organizations executing transformations that extend beyond D365 into adjacent technology domains — ERP modernization, infrastructure migration, or enterprise data strategy — benefit from HCLTech's capacity to coordinate these interdependencies within a unified engagement structure.
Cons
Its delivery model is calibrated for large enterprise programs, and its engagement structures, pricing minimums, and governance requirements may not align with the needs of mid-market organizations. Teams at mid-market scale may find the firm's processes cumbersome, and HCLTech's core incentives are directed toward higher-value enterprise accounts (i.e., mid-market buyers may receive less prioritized attention).
Hitachi Solutions
Standout feature
Hitachi Solutions has invested in building proprietary tooling and delivery accelerators across supply chain management and finance scenarios — capabilities that can meaningfully compress D365 implementation timelines in these functional areas. Organizations operating complex warehousing, procurement, or financial consolidation environments will find that Hitachi's pre-built assets reduce configuration effort and accelerate the path to a validated, deployable solution.
Pros
Its SCM functional depth means delivery teams engage at a level of precision that generalist partners rarely achieve in supply chain and finance workloads. Client organizations benefit from consultants who can challenge process assumptions, identify configuration risks early, and recommend solutions grounded in real-world operational knowledge — not just platform capability documentation.
Cons
The sophistication of its tools can lead to increased cost and complexity, requiring a significant investment of both time and capital. Organizations without significant SCM or financial complexity may not receive sufficient return on that investment. Programs spanning multiple D365 functional areas outside Hitachi's core domains may also encounter uneven depth of expertise as the engagement extends beyond its primary areas of focus.
HSO
Standout feature
HSO has developed proprietary intellectual property built natively on Dynamics, including vertical-specific accelerators and pre-configured industry solutions that reduce the gap between a standard D365 deployment and a production-ready implementation. This IP investment is particularly valuable during the design and configuration phase, where HSO's templated approaches help compress timelines and establish a more reliable baseline for customization decisions.
Pros
For organizations that qualify within HSO's core verticals, the engagement experience is notably different from working with a generalist partner. HSO's consultants bring contextual fluency — familiarity with your industry's terminology, regulatory pressures, and process expectations — that translate into faster workshops, tighter requirements alignment, and fewer costly scope adjustments during the build phase.
Cons
Because they are highly specialized, they may be less flexible when working outside their core industries. Organizations in sectors that fall outside HSO's primary focus may encounter a less differentiated engagement — one that relies more heavily on standard D365 configuration than on the proprietary IP advantage that defines HSO.
Rand Group
Standout feature
Rand Group brings substantive project depth in Business Central and CRM, with delivery teams that have accumulated meaningful hands-on experience across the configurations, integrations, and workflows most common in North American mid-market environments. This depth is particularly valuable during solution design, where Rand's practical knowledge base accelerates decision-making and reduces the exploratory effort typically required by less specialized partners.
Pros
Its geographic proximity to North American clients translates into accessible communication, faster response cycles, and delivery teams familiar with the regulatory, operational, and cultural context of the markets their clients operate in. This regional orientation, combined with a pragmatic implementation approach, makes Rand well-suited for mid-market organizations prioritizing straightforward execution over enterprise-scale delivery complexity.
Cons
Lacking the global infrastructure and multi-geography resources required for massive, worldwide enterprise rollouts, Rand Group's scale is calibrated for focused, regionally contained engagements rather than complex enterprise programs. Organizations managing multiple legal entities across different jurisdictions, or deeply integrated system environments, may find that Rand's delivery capacity and bench depth cannot comfortably absorb the scope.
RSM
Standout feature
RSM has established a leading position in the mid-market segment for Business Central and customer engagement implementations, combining functional depth with an advisory approach shaped by its broader accounting and consulting practice. This background creates delivery teams that understand the financial and operational interdependencies at the heart of most mid-market D365 deployments — and can navigate them with confidence and precision.
Pros
An excellent fit for SMB/mid-market companies that need a partner who understands both the software and the underlying financial compliance requirements, RSM delivers right-sized implementations that avoid the overhead of enterprise-scale delivery. The firm's blend of technology and business advisory capabilities is particularly valuable for organizations that need strategic guidance alongside technical execution in equal measure.
Cons
RSM's investment in people, tooling, and methodology is oriented toward the SMB and mid-market tier — which is a strength for buyers in that segment but a ceiling for those growing beyond it. Organizations that have crossed into enterprise-level complexity, with program governance requirements, integration volumes, or change management demands that exceed a typical mid-market scope, may find RSM's delivery structure a less natural fit as program requirements scale up.
sa.global
Standout feature
sa.global has built a specialized practice around project-based businesses — including professional services firms, legal organizations, and engineering consultancies — with deep expertise in D365 Project Operations and project lifecycle management. For organizations that bill time, manage complex resource allocations, or track project profitability as a core operational requirement, sa.global offers implementation depth that generalist partners rarely match.
Pros
Its professional services automation expertise is unmatched, ensuring that time-entry, billing, and project lifecycles are perfectly synced with the ERP. And sa.global's exclusive focus on project-centric industries means its consultants are typically fluent in the language of utilization, write-offs, milestone billing, and resource forecasting — enabling faster requirements alignment and more confident configuration decisions from organizations that depend on project profitability as a core performance metric.
Cons
Its narrow focus (being purpose-built for project-based industries) means organizations in product manufacturing, retail, or other non-project-centric sectors will find the firm's expertise less directly applicable to their operational context. For D365 programs centered on Supply Chain, Commerce, or field service workloads outside of project delivery, sa.global's vertical specialization becomes a limitation rather than an advantage.
Sikich LLP
Standout feature
Sikich combines mid-market D365 delivery capability with deep industry knowledge in manufacturing and professional services — two verticals where the intersection of finance, operations, and workforce management creates implementation complexity that requires domain-fluent guidance. Sikich's accounting and business advisory roots complement its technology practice, enabling delivery teams to focus on business outcomes rather than solely technical configuration.
Pros
Known for efficient delivery and avoiding the "bloat" often found in larger consultancies, Sikich minimizes overhead, compresses timelines, and keeps programs focused on the configurations that drive business value. Organizations in manufacturing or services sectors benefit from delivery teams that bring both D365 technical proficiency and functional familiarity with the operational processes, cost structures, and reporting requirements common to those industries.
Cons
Sikich LLP is built for depth within North America, not breadth across global markets. As organizations expand their D365 scope to include international entities — particularly those in EMEA or APAC — Sikich's delivery infrastructure and partner network may not provide the coverage or local regulatory familiarity needed to sustain program quality.
Sunrise Technologies
Standout feature
Sunrise Technologies has developed a highly focused practice in retail, fashion, and consumer goods — industries where inventory management, seasonal planning, omnichannel operations, and supplier collaboration create unique D365 implementation requirements. Organizations in these verticals benefit from Sunrise's ability to map industry-specific business processes directly to D365 Commerce and Supply Chain capabilities, reducing the need for extensive custom development.
Pros
Its domain expertise allows Sunrise to provide strategic advice that goes beyond software — they engage with buyers, planners, and operations teams on equal footing, reducing the time spent translating business requirements into system logic. This shared fluency accelerates workshops, sharpens design decisions, and produces implementations that are meaningfully closer to production-ready at go-live than what a generalist partner typically delivers in these environments.
Cons
With its vertical focus, organizations outside the consumer goods and retail space may find Sunrise’s approach less relevant to their business models. D365 programs in financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, or professional services will find Sunrise's functional depth less directly applicable, making it a less competitive choice when vertical expertise outside its core practice areas is required.
The best Microsoft Dynamics 365 results start with Argano
As stated, this is in no way a complete list. There are thousands of partners across the globe. But in creating this comparison, universal themes emerged in terms of strengths (industry expertise, global reach, cross-platform integration) and weaknesses (over-localized, niche solutioning).
What sets Argano apart from other Dynamics 365 consultancies (in addition to current Inner Circle Partner standing and multiple Partner of the Year wins) is our focus on driving high-performance operations through the Microsoft stack.
With every assessment, implementation, and service, Argano supports and serves each client’s unique strategy with both out-of-the box solutions and custom development, helping ensure maximum ROI while eliminating inefficiencies and mitigating risk.
And with global reach, expertise and experience across every major vertical, and partnerships with a wide range of business application providers (Oracle, Salesforce, SAP, and many more), Argano provides clients with literally unlimited options for building the business systems that support success now and in the future.
Contact us to get started with a free assessment.